You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

palladias comments on Group rationality diary, 8/20/12 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: cata 21 August 2012 09:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: palladias 21 August 2012 09:02:40PM 5 points [-]

My parents were visiting this past weekend, so I broke up all my cleaning tasks over a week and assigned them to specific days in RTM. This got the job done, but one thing I notices is that cleaning took vastly less time than I imagined when I was dreading it. (Example: scrubbing my bathroom floor took about 10-12 min counting grabbing supplies and I had imagined about 20-30 min).

So I learned: (a) I do have time to clean and put it at as recurring every other month task in RTM to assign these tasks over a week (b) Ugh fields screw with my time estimates, leading me to procrastinate or strike goals entirely, since when will I ever find the time?

Two possible countermoves to (b): 1. Visualize in detail what the task requires, notice that cleaning my mirror cannot take more than 5 min. Go do it. 2. Do 5 or 10 min worth of work on a task so my estimate of how long it will take is more accurate. It's fine to not complete the task during the trial, but if I'm surprised by how close I am to done, go for it!

I think I favor 2, since I'll have an easier time psyching myself up for "Five minutes of data gathering! My model of the world is getting more accurate" than experiencing something I don't want to do twice, once as visualization, once as reality. I'll try to find another task to test this way this week. Something I expect will take a while, but that I also notice I don't like.