You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Stupid Questions Open Thread Round 4 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: lukeprog 27 August 2012 12:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (179)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: loup-vaillant 28 August 2012 08:11:36AM 6 points [-]

This question may come off as a bit off topicĀ : people often say cryonics is a scam. Which is the evidence for that, and to the contrary? How should I gather it?

The thing is, cryonics is a priori awfully suspect. It appeal to one of our deepest motive (not dying), is very expensive, has unusual payment plans, and is just plain weird. So the prior of it being a scam designed to rip us off is quite high. On the other hand, reading about it here, I acquired a very strong intuition that it is not a scam, or at least that Alcor and CI are serious. The problem is, I don't have solid evidence I can tell others about.

Now, I doubt the scam argument is the main reason why people don't buy it. But I'd like to get that argument out of the way.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 28 August 2012 06:49:10PM 5 points [-]

I think cryonics is more likely to be a mistake than a scam, but that might just be my general belief that incompetence is much more common than malice.