You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Epiphany comments on Meta: What do you think of a karma vote checklist? - Less Wrong Discussion

24 Post author: NancyLebovitz 01 September 2012 09:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (58)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Epiphany 02 September 2012 12:28:59AM *  1 point [-]

I've been thinking that there needs to be specific feedback with the votes, myself. I'm going to release a "prevent endless September" plan for you all to critique soon which I am willing to volunteer to help accomplish (I'm a web pro) which recommends requiring users to give feedback - I feel that the anonymous, feedback-less, thumb downs with no accountability are a bane to innovative types, as it allows these commonly misunderstood folks to be censored without providing the feedback required for them to figure out how to communicate effectively. What I would like to see rather than a drop down is a box where you have to type at least one word as a reason. That way, you can always put something appropriate, yet it's still not hard to type "trolling" and it's not cumbersome for more advanced people to leave something specific like "appeal to popularity" or "optimism bias" as constructive criticism for the user.

Edit: Actually it would really be best to have a drop down for categories of up/down votes AND a box where you type at least one word. Except for trolling. Where you just hit "Trolling". Or spam.