You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

palladias comments on Cryonics: Can I Take Door No. 3? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Chris_Roberts 05 September 2012 03:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (111)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: palladias 05 September 2012 06:37:08PM 0 points [-]

Even without AIs, increases in human intelligences will soon almost certainly accelerate technological progress. It’s extraordinarily unlikely that evolution just happened to stumble upon the smartest people our phenotype can support when it created individuals such as Albert Einstein and John von Neumann. The exponentially decreasing costs of gene scanning will soon allow us to find the genetic basis of genius. (The Chinese are already looking!) And it won’t be too long after finding this that someone (such as the pro-eugenics Chinese) will create people vastly smarter than have ever existed. The technological advances that they will likely give us in areas such as nanotech will (if AI doesn’t give it to us first) significantly progress the day by which Alcor will be able to revive its cryonics clients.

Uh, you skipped a step. The bottleneck is trait-selection/gene therapy more than it is knowing where the gene loci are. We know the signatures of Huntington's and some other genetic diseases, but that hasn't led to the ability to cure them. Right now, we can only negatively select through abortion, so that wouldn't create the geniuses you're looking for.

Comment author: James_Miller 05 September 2012 07:14:28PM *  3 points [-]

See my article "A Thousand Chinese Einsteins Every Year" for a more detailed explanation. I've learned a lot since writing this article (in 2007) and my latest views on the potential of eugenics are fully spelled out in my book Singularity Rising that will be released in a few weeks.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 05 September 2012 06:58:18PM 1 point [-]

Another possible hard part: if world-shaking genius (not just being unusually smart) is the result of having the sort of mind which fits a solvable hard problem, then how would anyone know what traits to amplify and what education is needed?

Comment author: advancedatheist 05 September 2012 11:34:51PM 0 points [-]

Don't underestimate the power of g:

http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2002ghighlygeneral.pdf

Linda Gottfredson's papers in general reward study:

http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/