You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on Debugging the Quantum Physics Sequence - Less Wrong Discussion

32 Post author: Mitchell_Porter 05 September 2012 03:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (129)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 05 September 2012 04:21:31PM 3 points [-]

Too much digital ink has already been spilled over this word "obvious"

Probably because there is no precise definition of "obvious"? Does it mean "trivial", as in "its proof requires the skills much lower than those expected from the audience"? Clearly (ehm) not, since no interpretation can be proved or disproved. Does it mean "inevitable", as in "it can be proven from the premises, given some effort"? Nope, not that, either. So, no point arguing over whether MWI is obvious until everyone agrees what "obvious" means and how to check for obviousness.

Comment author: Pentashagon 05 September 2012 04:58:35PM 3 points [-]

If not everyone can agree on what "obvious" means then it is wrong to use the word in an argument.

Comment author: shminux 05 September 2012 05:03:23PM 11 points [-]

Obviously.

Comment author: [deleted] 05 September 2012 04:34:24PM -1 points [-]

I agree wholeheartedly.