You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Sarokrae comments on Call for Anonymous Narratives by LW Women and Question Proposals (AMA) - Less Wrong Discussion

20 [deleted] 09 September 2012 08:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (364)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Sarokrae 09 September 2012 01:15:44PM 7 points [-]

What is your evaluation of your own introspection abilities? (More precisely, how often do you consider the motivations for your emotions, attitudes, tone of speech, etc, and are you successful.)

I'd also like to ask this to the men.

Comment author: J_Taylor 10 September 2012 01:37:25AM *  4 points [-]

are you successful

Measuring the success of introspection (as in epistemic success, as opposed to instrumental success) runs into a Wittgensteinian problem heavily. That is, it is ‘As if someone were to buy several copies of the morning paper to assure himself that what it said was true’.

Comment author: Sarokrae 10 September 2012 02:03:21AM *  0 points [-]

I usually measure my success by whether I can predict my system 1 responses to a situation ahead of time. The point is to model myself properly anyway.

Also, my OH can read me like a book. We mutually developed the me-trospection so we checked reads with each other.

Comment author: J_Taylor 10 September 2012 02:19:25AM 1 point [-]

We mutually developed the me-trospection so we checked reads with each other.

Could you please explain this sentence?

Comment author: Sarokrae 10 September 2012 03:00:34AM 2 points [-]

We learned to read my mind at the same time, so could tell if at least one of us was wrong, by differing. Also we're not the same person, so rationalising in different directions means we were rarely both the same kind of wrong.

Comment author: chaosmosis 12 September 2012 05:52:01PM *  2 points [-]

I have a difficult time answering this. I analyze my current motives and mental states and actions in depth, constantly. But I don't spend very much time reviewing my past emotions or actions unless it becomes obvious to me that I made a mistake somewhere. I feel as though I should probably change this.

Comment author: [deleted] 09 September 2012 11:55:40PM 2 points [-]

I'd also like to ask this to the men.

Okay, then...

(More precisely, how often do you consider the motivations for your emotions, attitudes, tone of speech, etc,

Usually, several times per week.

and are you successful.)

I can seldom find good ways to test my introspection, so I don't know.

Comment author: Alicorn 09 September 2012 06:04:10PM *  3 points [-]

I am Luminosity Girl! Wheeeeee!

(Tone of speech in particular I don't think I have special control over.)

Comment author: lucidian 10 September 2012 04:10:40AM 0 points [-]

I introspect almost constantly, and try to keep a detailed archive of my thought processes so I can trace how my beliefs and opinions have evolved over time. I've found introspection extremely effective, especially when I discuss the results of my introspection with various analytical friends.