You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

FiftyTwo comments on Meta: LW Policy: When to prohibit Alice from replying to Bob's arguments? - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 Post author: SilasBarta 12 September 2012 03:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 12 September 2012 10:18:19PM -1 points [-]

I sympathise with the problem as you state it, but don't know enough about the particular circumstances to know if that is a fair summary or what you would be best doing about it.

Personally I would have preferred if you had mentioned the context in the original post in something like the format of: This thing happened [link and explanation], are we ok with this form of moderation being the norm on here?

Describing the issue in a very abstracted way gives an impression of subterfuge, and makes people feel excluded from the discussion.

Comment author: SilasBarta 12 September 2012 10:23:17PM *  3 points [-]

I don't disagree with any of that; I just don't know if I'd get as much criticism had I done it that way, or if I'd just be told, "HOW DARE YOU SPREAD THAT CONFLICT TO THE REST OF THE SITE YOU F***ING TERRORIST!"

Comment author: wedrifid 13 September 2012 06:43:41AM 6 points [-]

(My estimate is that you were wise to refrain from providing explicit references.)