You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

thomblake comments on Meta: LW Policy: When to prohibit Alice from replying to Bob's arguments? - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 Post author: SilasBarta 12 September 2012 03:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 13 September 2012 08:28:25PM *  2 points [-]

Not sure why the parent was downvoted.

"Arbitrary" and "random" tend to be used in different senses. "Random" connotes unpredictability, while "arbitrary" connotes subjectivity to individual judgement.

I was not intending to claim that the moderators' actions are based on rolling dice, for example.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 13 September 2012 08:55:44PM *  -1 points [-]

"Arbitrary" and "random" have similar meaning, but they have very different sense.

("Meaning" and "sense" have very similar meaning and sense to me.)

Comment author: thomblake 13 September 2012 09:04:26PM 1 point [-]

And so we see that I am a terrible communicator. I would blame the study of philosophy for introducing me to wonderful distinctions that no one else uses, though I'm sure a student of philosophy would tell me that "sense" and "reference" are the relevant subcategories of "meaning", and both of what I referred to above fall under "sense". Is Frege or C.S.Peirce in the house?

But seriously, fixed (I hope).