You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

thomblake comments on [Poll] Less Wrong and Mainstream Philosophy: How Different are We? - Less Wrong Discussion

38 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 26 September 2012 12:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (627)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 26 September 2012 05:27:42PM 3 points [-]

i.e. there are facts about what is right and wrong (or good and bad) that are not agent-relative.

Is that right? I've understood that you can be a realist about subject-sensitive objective moral facts. Is that different from saying that the facts are "agent-relative"?

Comment author: pragmatist 26 September 2012 05:46:28PM 1 point [-]

You're right, my potted descriptions here are misleading. Certain forms of relativism are appropriately classified as realist. I'll edit my descriptions.

Comment author: thomblake 26 September 2012 06:01:55PM 0 points [-]

Thanks! I was concerned I had it wrong.