You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

komponisto comments on [Poll] Less Wrong and Mainstream Philosophy: How Different are We? - Less Wrong Discussion

38 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 26 September 2012 12:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (627)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: komponisto 27 September 2012 03:01:36PM 2 points [-]

Can anyone exhibit an actual theist who says that a Matrix Lord composed of non-mental, non-mysterious parts counts as a God? So far as I know this position is held solely by people who want to mock the Simulation Hypothesis.

I hold it in order to mock theism.

Physicalist reductionism is such a fundamental part of my belief system that I think charity requires that theism be interpreted as the SH. I appeal to the popular perception of the absurdity of the SH in order to undermine professions of belief in theism.

Comment author: adamisom 27 September 2012 04:56:28PM *  0 points [-]

How (do you use it to mock/undermine theism)?

Comment author: komponisto 27 September 2012 06:05:19PM -1 points [-]

I appeal to the popular perception of the absurdity of the SH in order to undermine professions of belief in theism.

Comment author: adamisom 27 September 2012 08:05:43PM 1 point [-]

Cool. I should have specified 'I'm intrigued; can you move down a level of specificity (as to how)?'

Comment author: komponisto 27 September 2012 09:05:43PM 2 points [-]

Most people seem to believe that it's absurd to suppose we're living in the Matrix; I point out that theism is not significantly different from this.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 29 September 2012 09:09:51AM *  1 point [-]

Most people seem to believe that it's absurd to suppose we're living in the Matrix; I point out that theism is not significantly different from this.

According to my informal experiments with presenting the SA to friends, the absurdity reaction is highly sensitive to framing-effects and especially the particular sequence in which I present the premises.