You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Yvain comments on From First Principles - Less Wrong Discussion

48 [deleted] 27 September 2012 07:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Yvain 29 September 2012 12:53:41AM *  6 points [-]

I investigated a similar idea for a conworld once and ended up rejecting it.

AFAICT ziplines with modern technology really aren't good at covering long distances. I didn't study the math, but just eyeballing existing long-distance ziplines it seems you need approximately 1 meter height for 10-20 meters traveled. The average distance to school in the US seems to be between 1 mile and 5 miles depending on who you ask. Let's take the lower option. To go 1 mile you'd need a 250-500 foot mast. But that's just on average; some people will live two miles away and need 500-1000 foot masts - up to as high as the Stratosphere Tower in Vegas.

Not only do you have to pay for a Stratosphere Tower on every block (there are 72000 blocks in Manhattan!), not only do you have to tolerate a forest of huge towers that will probably lower land value, but you've also got to get kids up a 500 foot tower every morning, which means realistically that you're paying for some really good elevators. And we're still only saving kids a two mile bike ride or five minutes waiting for a bus!

You could limit it to the blocks closest to the school to decrease max tower height, but that would also limit the benefit.

Comment author: prase 30 September 2012 04:32:22PM 3 points [-]

500-1000 foot masts

Who says the whole distance ought to be covered by a single line?