= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
chaosmosis comments on Open Thread, October 1-15, 2012 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (477)
I found this interesting. I personally don't think it's a paradox, but I think it's interesting that the logic behind it works.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven_paradox
If it's not a paradox, that the logic behind it works should never be interesting. How it works is another story.
I disagree. I don't approach it from the perspective of "it's not a paradox, therefore the logic behind it is interesting". I approach it from the position of "oh, this does work after all, neat, therefore this is not a paradox".
I sorta feel like I'm being chided by your comment, too, and I don't like that.