You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on [Link] The real end of science - Less Wrong Discussion

14 [deleted] 03 October 2012 04:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 23 October 2012 02:05:03PM 1 point [-]

They are under a deadline to come up with something-anything useful within a few years

For better or worse, being useful isn't something that's important for academic biology research. If you discover a new biochemical pathway, you get published whether or not the knowledge helps anybody to do something useful.

No one is going to magically publish a working paper in Nature tomorrow where they have succeeded in such an effort overnight. Yet, this is basically what the current system expects.

That's I don't see why someone who would develop something that would work as one of the components of the tool wouldn't get published in Nature.

Our society spends billions to kill a few Muslims who MIGHT kill some people violently.

That's a very naive way to look at things. Killing a few Muslims who MIGHT kill some people violently isn't the only goal of the various wars. As long as you pretend it is things are hard to understand.