= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Pentashagon comments on We won't be able to recognise the human Gödel sentence - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (33)
Doesn't that allow for Stuart Armstrong to have a false belief?
"Stuart Armstrong cannot justify a belief in this sentence" might be a stronger form since it implicitly refers to any logical or rational reasoning that might be used to justify the belief.
There are some obvious weaknesses to human Godel sentences. Stuart Armstrong is not a permanent name. Additionally our biology changes over time so we probably can't have permanent personal Godel sentences.