Douglas_Reay comments on [Book Review] "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail—But Some Don’t.", by Nate Silver - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Loading…
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
Comments (8)
Has anyone here read the book? What did you think of it? Would you recommend it?
I've read it - it's inspired a short series I shall be posting shortly.
ETA: not a chapter-by-chapter review, though I might do that too; rather, I focus on one small aspect (the "waterline" model discussed in connection with the poker bubble) and use it to illustrate something else (tips and tricks in forecasting).
I read it - I think the way I described it to the Less Wrong DC group was, "like an introductory Less Wrong article, except a book."
To elaborate a bit: * Pro: The writing is clear and engaging. * Pro: There's a lot of good case-study material and a bit of useful theory connecting them. * Con: The book is lacking in technical detail regarding Bayesian thinking (and his formulation of Bayes' Theorem is kinda messy). * Con: Nate Silver is more prone to claim successful predictors as being Bayesian thinkers than he justifies in the text. * Con: There are a few glaring typos in the first printing (e.g. a table on which the "Correlated" and "Uncorrelated" column headers are switched).
It's easy to read, and it's worth reading for the case studies, but I'd probably put it at a "Borrow" rather than a "Buy" recommendation.
ETA: The review you posted is good.