You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

handoflixue comments on Reasons for someone to "ignore" you - Less Wrong Discussion

23 Post author: Wei_Dai 08 October 2012 07:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: handoflixue 09 October 2012 11:12:46PM *  10 points [-]

Since no one else seems to have said this yet: I like getting responses, and even huge delays are not an issue! :)

I occasionally reply to year old posts, and occasionally get replies to year old comments/posts of mine. I enjoy both of these situations - the latter tends to prompt me to revisit a topic, and I'll often have new insights or perspective since I've only been at this 'rationality' thing for a couple years.

5-day-old responses are rarely even noticed by me - I'm used to 1-2 weeks for a reply to m personal email! Not everyone checks the internet daily, and people often vanish for weekends, vacations, or just general being-busy or low-on-spoons.

Edit: I'd also suggest that a community norm of "It's okay to reply, even 2 years later" would be cool - if the person being-replied-to doesn't want to revisit the topic, they can just ignore the reply, after all.

Comment author: cata 10 October 2012 12:45:46AM *  4 points [-]

I think we already have that norm on Less Wrong -- I see lots of replies to old comments in the Recent Comments pane, often creating new trails of discussion months or years after the parent comment. I like it very much.

Comment author: handoflixue 11 October 2012 05:45:47PM 1 point [-]

Judging by the comments on this thread, it seemed that a lot of people still felt guilt, so I assumed that "this is okay" is not a clear community norm, despite the actual behavior being quite common. I wanted to signal boost "I am okay with this, and I strongly suspect so are a lot of people" without lying and claiming I actually knew how the community-at-large felt :)

Comment author: CWG 11 October 2012 04:44:28AM 3 points [-]

Me too. I get frustrated by forums where old threads are routinely closed, or where participants are rebuked for bumping an old thread.

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 11 October 2012 04:53:40AM 2 points [-]

Or forums where you post something, arguing why open discussion of a certain topic should be allowed, and your comment is rendered selectively invisible a few minutes after you make it.

Comment author: wedrifid 11 October 2012 09:08:59AM 1 point [-]

Or forums where you post something, arguing why open discussion of a certain topic should be allowed, and your comment is rendered selectively invisible a few minutes after you make it.

I'm told it is only worth arguing about such things at Alicorn's Dinner Parties. Although I can't imagine it is the optimal strategy for being invited back.

Comment author: Alicorn 11 October 2012 04:37:26PM 4 points [-]

It's not really that helpful to argue it at my dinner parties, either. I'm at all of them, I oppose the karma tax, it's still here.

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 11 October 2012 11:10:53AM 0 points [-]

I was going to retract that comment... I have No Opinion on the advisability of current moderation policy and practice, in general. It's just this one issue where I hope that the powers will eventually see sense; so complaining about the bare fact that they choose to exercise their authority is not the thing to do.

Comment author: wedrifid 11 October 2012 09:05:44AM 1 point [-]

Edit: I'd also suggest that a community norm of "It's okay to reply, even 2 years later" would be cool - if the person being-replied-to doesn't want to revisit the topic, they can just ignore the reply, after all.

I'd suggest that not only would such a norm be cool, it actually is cool.