You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Abandoning Cached Selves to Re-Write My Source Code Partially, I've Become Unstable - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: diegocaleiro 10 October 2012 05:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (101)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 11 October 2012 11:35:55PM 3 points [-]

To be precise, "Good people are consequentialists, but virtue ethics is what works."

Comment author: Mestroyer 12 October 2012 11:13:37AM 5 points [-]

So if you can choose to change yourself between a consequentialist and a virtue ethicist, a consequentialist will abandon their goodness for what works and become more virtue ethicist, but a virtue ethicist will persue goodness and become more consequentialist?

If we thought of this as a chemical reaction, would it have the same equilibrium constant for everybody? What could change it? Maybe an inaccurate self-image, because if you thought you were more consequentialist than you were, you would be less inclined to actually become more consequentialist, and stay more virtue ethicist?

Comment author: diegocaleiro 14 October 2012 12:05:35AM 1 point [-]

The intertwining of awesomeness and practical absurdity of this comment amuses me immensely.

Comment author: diegocaleiro 22 February 2013 04:10:27AM 1 point [-]

to this day, it still does.