You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TimS comments on The basic argument for the feasibility of transhumanism - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: ChrisHallquist 14 October 2012 08:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TimS 24 October 2012 06:05:18PM *  3 points [-]

This argument is called the Doomsday Argument. It has been discussed several times around these parts (e.g. here)

In a technical sense, the issue resolves around how you think self-sampling should be understood. You might consider looking up the "Sleeping Beauty" problem for more discussion of that point.

In a non-technical sense, there's what might be called the "reference-class problem." On the one hand, the number of people in existence has constantly been increasing over time. On the other, the number of interconnected civilizations seems to be dropping (after the widespread adoption of the internet, one could argue that the number of distinct civilizations currently in existence can be counted on one's fingers and toes). Figuring out the correct reference class has profound effects on the conclusions one reaches using this kind of reasoning.

Comment author: Mouthwash 24 October 2012 06:10:06PM 0 points [-]

Yeah, I knew I couldn't have been the only one to have thought of this.