You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanArmak comments on If we live in a simulation, what does that imply? - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: JoshuaFox 25 October 2012 09:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (59)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 26 October 2012 11:18:13PM 0 points [-]

If the heuristics of the simulator are good enough, it might just do something akin to detecting our attempts at analyzing low-res data, and dynamically generate something relevant and self-consistent.

In other words, maybe the simulator is doing the equivalent of ray-tracing. When a ray of light impacts the simulated Earth, the process that generated it is simulated in detail only when a bit of Earth becomes suitably entangled with the outcome - but not if the ray serves to merely heat up the atmosphere a bit.