You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

BlueSun comments on Prediction market sequence requested - Less Wrong Discussion

30 [deleted] 26 October 2012 10:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: BlueSun 26 October 2012 05:24:39PM *  5 points [-]

Coming from an Econ background, I'm amazed that people don't understand how much information a properly functioning price mechanism conveys and how valuable it is. For me, thinking about the implications of I, Pencil was valuable in helping me understand this and I'd recommend it. People need to understand how the invisible hand and profit motive work (and have some confidence that they do) before they can understand how a prediction market can aggregate all the relevant information into a meaningful probability because prediction markets are a logical extension of those ideas.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 October 2012 06:32:51PM *  3 points [-]

I agree. I assumed any prediction markets sequence that would be undertaken would include this. Even one that didn't would at least be useful to the economically literate who haven't considered prediction markets yet.

Comment author: BlueSun 26 October 2012 11:41:01PM 1 point [-]

That's a good point too. which brings up the question of why they're not as well accepted. I've kind of figured it was because prediction markets are a new(er) idea and "science advances one funeral at a time." I predict the next wave of economists will all think in terms of prediction markets, p=80%.