You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RichardKennaway comments on The Problem With Rational Wiki - Less Wrong Discussion

20 [deleted] 26 October 2012 11:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 26 October 2012 12:06:12PM *  9 points [-]

What else remains? What other plausible function does it serve?

It keeps the riff-raff out of LessWrong.

Comment author: cata 26 October 2012 10:49:38PM 22 points [-]

A pleasantly pithy remark, but also a nasty one to present without actual evidence. We don't need cheerleading, especially at the expense of people who probably could contribute effectively to LW if they felt like it.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 27 October 2012 06:54:13AM 14 points [-]

Ok, I was engaging in a bit of their proudly proclaimed SPOV. If they hand it out they'd better be able to take it as well.

As context for the joke, the most middle-class of the national supermarket chains in the UK is Waitrose. (Middle-class as opposed to working-class; the upper class would not be seen in such places.) Number two is Sainsburys. So, some comedian remarked, what's the point of Sainsburys? To keep the riff-raff out of Waitrose.

Comment author: jsteinhardt 28 October 2012 04:42:45AM 3 points [-]

LOL apparently I am the riff-raff.

Comment author: cata 27 October 2012 09:04:57AM 1 point [-]

Aha, thanks for the explanation. Being an American I didn't know the reference and interpreted it as a generic snark.

Comment author: gjm 29 October 2012 01:20:05AM 3 points [-]

I'm from the UK and didn't know the reference either.

Comment author: DanielLC 26 October 2012 11:53:58PM 6 points [-]

Is that a good thing? We can hardly raise the sanity waterline if only the most sane people hang out here.

Comment author: [deleted] 27 October 2012 10:50:25AM 8 points [-]

Honestly I'm much more concerned about LessWrong staying as sane as it is. Overall I think there are several negative indications.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 28 October 2012 08:35:41AM *  4 points [-]

Honestly I'm much more concerned about LessWrong staying as sane as it is. Overall I think there are several negative indications.

I agree. I always thought the "raising the sanity waterline" was a substitute for "refining the art of human rationality", not a compliment. Imagine if the Logical Empiricists tried recruiting everyday people rather than the scientific elite (and other scientifically literate philosophers)? I fear that HPMOR, while I've gotten a lot of value from it, was the beginning of the end for this place. At the very least, I think these efforts should be spun off as much as possible (and without links leading back here). I say, let self-selection effects do their thing.

Comment author: David_Gerard 28 October 2012 09:10:53PM 3 points [-]

CFAR appears to be precisely this.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 27 October 2012 05:54:56AM *  0 points [-]

The think the more sane getting more sane raises the water line.

EDIT - Even I don't know what the hell I was saying here.