= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Benja comments on Things philosophers have debated - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (76)
Pfft, I don't see what's so funny about the end. If it had been
, alright, that would have been somewhat ironic at least, but )
? Nobody was even arguing against that.
I saw "You can help Wikipedia by expanding it." as the amusing ending...
Trivialists are!
But they weren't. Trivialists certainly do assert that)
is true, and so is 
A trivialist would insist that "Trivialists argue
) is false" is true. Believing that you're arguing something isn't quite the same as arguing something, but I wanted to point out that under trivialism, trivialists think they're arguing for and against all propositions simultaneously.