You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RobertLumley comments on November 2012 Media Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: RobertLumley 02 November 2012 06:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (88)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RobertLumley 02 November 2012 06:02:20AM 1 point [-]

Non Fiction Books Thread

Comment author: gwern 03 November 2012 02:31:33AM 6 points [-]

In descending order of how much I liked them, I read in October nonfiction:

  • When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God, Luhrmann
  • Proving History: Bayes's Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus, Carrier
  • Liars and Outliers: How Security Holds Society Together, Schneier
  • Walden, Thoreau
  • Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010, Murray
  • Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work, Crawford
  • When Prophecy Fails, Festinger
  • Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche
  • Psychiatry And The Human Condition, Charlton
Comment author: palladias 03 November 2012 03:22:47AM 3 points [-]

I also really enjoyed When God Talks Back. I had a review copy around the same time as I was reading Thinking Fast and Slow and did two posts on Luhrmann's book that may be of interest to LWers or, at least, give you a better idea of whether you'd be interested in the book: “What’s Hard is Simple, What’s Natural Comes Hard” and "Quasi-Transhumanist Charismatic Christians"

Comment author: FiftyTwo 02 November 2012 03:55:08PM 5 points [-]

The Personal MBA

Generally I hate business stuff but this book presents it really well, references modern cognitive science and avoids the bullshit management speak. Were I feeling cheesy I'd call it "a business book for rationalists" (they even quote Eleizer).

Disclaimer, since I've never read any other proper business books so I don't know how someone with more domain specific knowledge would find it.

Comment author: Bakkot 02 December 2012 09:40:47PM 4 points [-]
Comment author: FiftyTwo 02 December 2012 10:04:54PM 0 points [-]

Cool, I noticed a lot of parallels but didn't realise he was a contributor. I reiterate my endorsement.

Comment author: Vaniver 03 November 2012 06:14:20PM 2 points [-]

I have read a number of business books. That one is by far my favorite, and I've given away at least two copies to friends now. (Which reminds me, I ought to buy myself another copy.)

Comment author: RomeoStevens 03 November 2012 10:41:45PM 0 points [-]

ordered, thanks.

Comment author: Jabberslythe 04 November 2012 01:03:09AM 1 point [-]

Does anyone want to share Good Read accounts? Here's mine.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 November 2012 11:13:04PM *  3 points [-]

I created a group for this purpose: LessWrong on GoodReads.

Join us (me) !

Comment author: Emile 15 November 2012 03:20:59PM 0 points [-]

Joined! and, I created an account: http://www.goodreads.com/MrEmile

Comment author: wedrifid 04 November 2012 03:52:53AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: gwern 04 November 2012 02:48:27AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 05 November 2012 12:44:22AM 0 points [-]

Church & Regis, Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves.

Choice quote:

For all the benefits its promises, synthetic biology is potentially more dangerous than chemical or nuclear weaponry, since organisms can self-replicate, spread rapidly throughout the world, and mutate and evolve on their own...

So, how should we prioritize our research and life goals? ...We could join George Mallory, who justified a huge and risky effort with the phrase "Because it's there" — referring to Mount Everest where his body was lost, frozen in ice, for 75 years. But this is to blunder along blindly...

As a general goal I propose that, as a minimum, we ought to avoid the loss of all intelligent life in the universe.

The authors mention the singularity, and Singularity University, shortly after that, and they cite Good and Vinge and Kurzweil, but they ignore Yudkowsky and Singularity Institute.