= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
GabrielDuquette comments on A place for casual, non-karmic discussion for lesswrongers? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (88)
Popularity would still be expressed by number of replies from the "right" people. How do you hide that?
I can't think of a way, but LW feels like much less of a popularity contest, and it has that problem.
How would you feel about a market for better communicators on LW? Say, voluntary character limits (twice Twitter's? thrice?) and a Gunning Fog meter. Not sure how you'd establish successful compression, but if you could, more karma could be awarded for it than for a typical comment style.
I don't think verbosity is a big problem on LW. People not making posts for fear of being downvoted, or just not investing the time necessary to create good discussion/top-level posts, seems much bigger.
Accessibility is a problem, and verbosity is one of the causes.
It is much more segmented popularity contest because who are the "right" people vaires.
Follower count is a global instantly updated popularity contest, which may be considered worse.
Kate Evans earned a ton of followers quickly because her feed is really good (if occasionally opaque). Twitter is a segmented popularity contest, but the segments populated mostly by rationalists lend credence to the notion of a functional reputation market.