You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Furcas comments on If MWI is correct, should we expect to experience Quantum Torment? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Furcas 10 November 2012 04:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (69)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Furcas 10 November 2012 08:18:19AM 4 points [-]

Sure, but the subjective experience of being my past self will never causally follow from my subjective experience of being the current me, so I don't care.

Put another way, you're talking about timeless immortality. I'm talking about real immortality.

Comment author: Nominull 10 November 2012 06:15:00PM 2 points [-]

The difference between "never" and "with order epsilon probability" is of order epsilon, I wouldn't worry your head about it.

And you're not talking about real immortality, that's my point. Quantum immortality is no more real than timeless immortality, and arguably less.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 10 November 2012 01:08:11PM 1 point [-]

Put another way, you're talking about timeless immortality. I'm talking about real immortality.

You're talking about a different notion of immortality. As it ignores probability, it doesn't seem to capture the usual concept very well.

Comment author: wedrifid 11 November 2012 02:50:51AM *  1 point [-]

You're talking about a different notion of immortality. As it ignores probability, it doesn't seem to capture the usual concept very well.

For sure, whatever kind of "immortality" it is it certainly isn't something I would tend to describe as "real"!