You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Larks comments on [LINK] Steven Landsburg "Accounting for Numbers" - response to EY's "Logical Pinpointing" - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: David_Gerard 14 November 2012 12:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (46)

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Larks 15 November 2012 12:48:59AM 1 point [-]

This is defining numbers in terms of sets

But we don't need to use the full strength of set theory (or anything like it), so it might still be an improvement. Though I think there are still other problems.

Comment author: Giles 15 November 2012 03:18:28AM 0 points [-]

Yes - fair enough.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit