You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

thomblake comments on [LINK] Steven Landsburg "Accounting for Numbers" - response to EY's "Logical Pinpointing" - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: David_Gerard 14 November 2012 12:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (46)

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 15 November 2012 09:00:29PM 0 points [-]

All universal programming languages (assembler, C, CLIP, Lisp, Cobol, Python, Java) can parse perl as well.

Only if they implement Perl, perfectly mimicking the functionality of perl (the only spec for Perl). Amongst other difficulties, Perl has available the full power of Perl at the preprocessing stage.

Comment author: Clippy 15 November 2012 11:44:51PM 0 points [-]

That doesn't matter, kind of like non-paperclips.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit