You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

buybuydandavis comments on How well defined is ADHD? - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: jsalvatier 15 November 2012 11:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 16 November 2012 02:50:58AM 2 points [-]

Actually, there are a whole bunch of distinctions within ADHD.

First, there's the common ADD versus ADHD. But a Dr. Amen makes multiple distinctions beyond that. He's got six types. In terms of satisfying your standards for ADHD being real, he classifies based on SPECT imaging and behavior, claiming correlation, though I can't remember the specifics now.

I'd say that the brain can screw up in lots of ways, and lots of those ways get called ADHD, but I would expect fuzzy and sometimes contradictory classifications because most are based on behavior, and not on detailed white box measurement of what is going on in the brain. Different ways of sub optimal function will get boxed together based on some behavior, but then unboxed with finer parsing of the behavior.

http://www.amenclinics.com/conditions/adhd-add

I was diagnosed, or at least given the option of trying medication once. Adderall didn't do anything for me. But I read up a bunch, as we are wont to do around here. One theory not generally advertised is that ADHD is about having too low a basal level of activity in the prefrontal lobe, so that you're too easily distracted by acute stimuli.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 November 2012 03:03:29AM 0 points [-]

One theory not generally advertised is that ADHD is about having too low a basal level of activity in the prefrontal lobe, so that you're too easily distracted by acute stimuli.

Not generally advertised? Isn't that the most basic mainstream theory? I mean... that's the whole point of hammering the frontal lobe with stimulants!

Comment author: buybuydandavis 16 November 2012 03:44:59AM 2 points [-]

The distinction between basal and phasic levels isn't well advertised.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 November 2012 04:11:40AM 1 point [-]

The distinction between basal and phasic levels isn't well advertised.

Ahh, I think I understand. Would you care to give some elaboration on what you mean by "phasic" to ensure we are on the same page?

Comment author: jsalvatier 16 November 2012 06:41:12AM 6 points [-]

And for those of us who don't know anything about this.