You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

passive_fist comments on LW Women: LW Online - Less Wrong Discussion

29 [deleted] 15 February 2013 01:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (590)
Tags: lw_women gender meta

Comments (590)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: passive_fist 15 February 2013 06:49:15AM 24 points [-]

There also seems to be quite a lot of knee-jerk up-voting of poorly researched armchair ev-psych.

Indeed, and I am sad to say that I have seen this even in the top-level posts and blog as well. I'm actually doing a write-up about evo-psych and why a rationalist community should maybe try to avoid it. I might post it to this forum if there's interest.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 February 2013 08:24:33AM 16 points [-]

Indeed, and I am sad to say that I have seen this even in the top-level posts and blog as well. I'm actually doing a write-up about evo-psych and why a rationalist community should maybe try to avoid it. I might post it to this forum if there's interest.

I'm not just interested, I'm fascinated. Please do.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 15 February 2013 07:59:18AM 4 points [-]

Alicorn wrote this post, but I for one am interested in reading more on the topic.

Comment author: MugaSofer 20 February 2013 10:58:35AM -2 points [-]

I'm actually doing a write-up about evo-psych and why a rationalist community should maybe try to avoid it. I might post it to this forum if there's interest.

Well, I'm interested, and judging from all those upvotes I'm not the only one.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit