You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jooyous comments on LW Women: LW Online - Less Wrong Discussion

29 [deleted] 15 February 2013 01:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (590)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jooyous 16 February 2013 12:21:09AM *  2 points [-]

I agree that this happens but I think it's not nice to point it out unless the user has specifically requested it? If you think it's important to point out, then starting with questions and asking permission to offer input are more respectful and effective ways to communicate

For example, I will sometimes respond to a direct question about feelings or emotional states, and people will jump in to tell me I am rationalitying wrong. Even though I made no mention of how I handled that emotional state or what my actions were! I was just reporting on the initial situation. It's in those times that people usually just tell me to think/do what I usually do and it's arrogant and not particularly insightful. =/

Comment author: MugaSofer 20 February 2013 11:01:18AM 1 point [-]

I can't speak for your experience in this case, but this is, after all, a rationality/unbiasing site. If they think you're Doing It Wrong, then it's not exactly offtopic to point it out.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 20 February 2013 04:09:42PM 1 point [-]

On the other hand, people who offer correction (and offering correction can be a very strong motivation) should consider how much evidence they're got that they're addressing a real problem.

Comment author: jooyous 20 February 2013 06:15:24PM *  1 point [-]

Or that they're addressing it in a way that is likely to motivate the person to correct it!

Comment author: MugaSofer 21 February 2013 05:52:55PM -2 points [-]

Very true. As I said, I can't speak for your experience of this, I'm just pointing out that it's not exactly a non-sequiter. It may well have been rude and/or based on insufficient evidence, of course.

Comment author: jooyous 21 February 2013 07:15:33PM *  1 point [-]

Nono, you're right. But I think it's not just rude but also a failure to wait before proposing solutions, which is all sorts of useful in general. This is a good context to practice in!

Comment author: MugaSofer 25 February 2013 07:13:02PM -2 points [-]

You know, you're absolutely right. Upvoted.

Comment author: jooyous 02 March 2013 12:01:32AM 3 points [-]

I wish LW had a bit more of a handshake culture where we try to converge to a common phrasing to describe a topic before we actually try to discuss it. Something like

Do I understand you are saying [paraphrase]?

Sort of, but I also mean [original paraphrase with additional, necessary detail].

[ ... ]

I was going to say that [initial phrase] demonstrates [this tricky bias] but since you pointed out [necessary detail] then I guess it could have been [this other thing].

This allows the first person to demonstrate their reasoning about what they initially wanted to say, but also consider the actual problem, as well as gauge how far off their initial guess was. And then the other person doesn't feel misunderstood, so they're motivated to continue the conversation instead of just not replying.