You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fubarobfusco comments on LW Women Submissions: On Misogyny - Less Wrong Discussion

27 [deleted] 10 April 2013 07:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (472)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 11 April 2013 11:40:22PM *  4 points [-]

It's also possible for the same person (e.g. a child or teenager) to receive abuse from more than one person (e.g. both parents). This may counterbalance the above somewhat.

(On the other hand, it seems rather certain that the proportion of rape victims is higher than the proportion of rapists, since IIRC almost all rapists are repeat offenders.)

Comment author: Intrism 11 April 2013 11:53:44PM *  8 points [-]

I'd argue that being a repeat offender is, for any crime and especially those with low conviction rates, more likely than being a repeat victim, by simple logic of "an offender chooses, a victim does not." You are right, though, in that I should have mentioned the possibility.

Comment author: MugaSofer 12 April 2013 01:28:36PM -1 points [-]

IIRC almost all rapists are repeat offenders.

Don't suppose anyone has a source for this? I can see how it could come about, but it would be nice to have something solid.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 12 April 2013 03:18:00PM 4 points [-]

Good catch. The Harvard rape study (Lisak & Miller 2002) claims 63%, which my brain had apparently rounded up to "almost all". Sigh. Silly brain.