Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

DataPacRat comments on Cryonic resurrection - an ethical hypothetical - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: ialdabaoth 25 November 2012 12:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (28)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DataPacRat 26 November 2012 07:47:44PM 3 points [-]

Is anyone even considering waiting for at least 1.01?

Comment author: ialdabaoth 26 November 2012 07:55:50PM *  3 points [-]

I think, definitionally, anything that happens beyond 1.00 is an augmentation, not a resurrection. You can't get more information out of a process than you put into it.

EDIT: It would be useful to me to know why this just got downvoted.

Comment author: Crude_Dolorium 27 November 2012 06:30:24PM *  1 point [-]

WRT fidelity of reproduction, yes – but the scale is described in terms of defects that we'd object to regardless of whether they were faithful to the original mind. Most people would prefer to be resurrected with higher intelligence and better memory than they originally had, for instance.

It might be better to describe (edit: as Tenoke already did) the imperfect resurrection as causing not impairment but change: the restored mind is fully functional, but some information is lost and must be replaced with inaccurate reconstructions. The resurrected patient is not quite the same person as before; everything that made them who they are – their personality, their tastes and inclinations, their memories, their allegiances and cares and loves – is different. How inaccurate a resurrection is even worthwhile? How long would you wait (missing out on centuries of life!) for better accuracy?

(This is reminiscent of the scenario where a person is reconstructed from their past behavior instead of their brain. The result might resemble the original, but it's unlikely to be very faithful; in particular, secrets they never revealed would be almost impossible to recover, and some such secrets are important.)