You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RomeoStevens comments on Replaceability as a virtue - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: chaosmage 12 December 2012 07:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (41)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 11 December 2012 03:55:49AM 0 points [-]

What if by making myself irreplaceable I maximize my income and donate more money to x-risk reduction? I don't buy the concept of altruism towards people who don't care about x-risk.

Comment author: Swimmer963 12 December 2012 03:19:53AM 0 points [-]

I don't buy the concept of altruism towards people who don't care about x-risk.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Comment author: RomeoStevens 12 December 2012 03:48:09AM 0 points [-]

On reflection I think I misused the word altruism. I'm an egoist, but my actions towards others may seem altruistic in cases where those others are optimizing for futures I prefer. For example, Aubrey de Grey is better at optimizing for a future in which I don't die than I am, so I prefer to give him some of my optimization power.

Comment author: Swimmer963 12 December 2012 12:58:16PM 0 points [-]

OK, so what you're trying to say is "I, personally, act 'altruistic' towards people who are working on x-risk, and don't buy the concept of being 'altruistic' towards anyone else." Is that right? I was reading it as "a given person's behaviour can't be called altruistic unless they are working on x-risk."

Comment author: RomeoStevens 12 December 2012 07:18:51PM 0 points [-]

Yes.