I disagree strongly.
We don't want to encourage people to create superfluous accounts, do we?
Why? Because we will run out of bits?
Therefore I think LessWrong codebase should be patched so that karma does not go below zero even with lots of downvotes.
I disagree. There is a useful distinction to be made between someone starting out at 0 karma or just breaking even and someone running a negative score.
There is a useful distinction to be made between someone starting out at 0 karma or just breaking even and someone running a negative score.
There is, but my point was that you can't make this useful distinction usefully.
It came to my attention that when you receive downvotes for your comments, your karma goes negative and you need to "pay back" to be able to post to Discussion or to Main.
Since new users start with zero karma, having negative karma seems to just encourage those with negative karma to create a new account. We don't want to encourage people to create superfluous accounts, do we? Therefore I think LessWrong codebase should be patched so that karma does not go below zero even with lots of downvotes.
What do you think?