You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emile comments on Negative karma is a bad design - Less Wrong Discussion

-9 Post author: sanxiyn 13 December 2012 11:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (31)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Emile 13 December 2012 01:26:13PM 11 points [-]

Rather than fixing hypothetical future problems, I would rather have work spent on fixing things that cause problems now, for example:

  • when you click on a permalink to a single comment (like those you find in your mailbox, or in the recent comments), the whole thread it's in is marked as read (and won't be in green any more)

  • There is no way to see the upovote / downvote split on posts and comments, only upvotes minus downvotes (though I'm not sure that would be such an improvement, it's just something a lot of people ask for; there recent "poll" feature may be a better way)

(unless of course you were planning on implementing, testing and submitting the fix yourself!)

Comment author: sanxiyn 13 December 2012 02:17:16PM 7 points [-]
  • This came up on #lesswrong IRC channel, it was not a hypothetical future problem at all.
  • Yes, I was planning on implementing, testing, submitting the fix myself.
Comment author: gwern 14 December 2012 01:27:20AM 6 points [-]

This came up on #lesswrong IRC channel, it was not a hypothetical future problem at all.

Being discussed somewhere does not show it is real. Personally, 'people are cycling from account to account to evade karma limits' doesn't seem like a real problem...

Comment author: TimS 13 December 2012 07:42:05PM *  3 points [-]

Can you be more specific on what you think the problem is?

I agree that the current (downvoting + minimum karma for Discussion) dynamic encourages creating new accounts, holding everything else equal. But I'm not sure what the downside of inflated registered-user numbers is - there's not much sock-puppetry locally, so it isn't clear how additional registrations can be considered relevant to signal-to-noise issues.

And there are tangible benefits to the downvoting system (helps increase quality posts, crowd-sourcing basic moderation).

Comment author: Emile 13 December 2012 04:06:46PM 2 points [-]

Ah, cool!

Then, I have much less to complain about, offers of help are much more useful than suggestions from back seat drivers :)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 December 2012 01:38:25PM 2 points [-]

I agree on both, but I think you should have this as a separate discussion thread.

Comment author: Emile 13 December 2012 04:08:54PM 1 point [-]

Well, though I also don't really want to start a new discussion on these (this kind of meta stuff doesn't add much value to the site), just say "these seem to be things people complain about even more".