You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Thomas comments on A utility-maximizing varient of AIXI - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: AlexMennen 17 December 2012 03:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (20)

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Thomas 17 December 2012 07:37:00PM *  0 points [-]

I wouldn't use N element of N. But rather n element of N or something. Just a small nitpick.

EDIT: I was watching on my laptop and didn't see that the second N is a bit fatter.

Comment author: AlexMennen 17 December 2012 08:03:41PM 1 point [-]

means the set of natural numbers.

Comment author: Thomas 17 December 2012 08:21:47PM 0 points [-]

Yes, the fat N. It's clear in a higher resolution.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit