You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Karl comments on The "Scary problem of Qualia" - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 [deleted] 19 December 2012 12:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Karl 19 December 2012 09:13:10PM 0 points [-]

Did the person come into existence:

Ve came into existence whenever a computation isomorphic to verself was performed.

Comment author: DaFranker 19 December 2012 09:50:58PM 1 point [-]

That seems to trivially follow. It also seems to just push the burden of reduction onto "performed".

Comment author: CronoDAS 20 December 2012 11:37:11PM *  2 points [-]

Yes, that's a big problem.

The linked article is kind of confused, but I don't know how to answer the general argument, which is related to "Dust Theory". If there is a computer program that you can run which will be conscious - call it "Program Dave" - there's a snag you can run into. For any random bit string you give me, I can design a "computer" that, when it "runs" that bit string as a program, it will interpret the bit string as being Program Dave. There's no obvious way to look at something and tell if it's "really" a copy of Program Dave or not, because everything is a copy of Program Dave if you look at it the right way.

See also.