You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

army1987 comments on Against NHST - Less Wrong Discussion

57 Post author: gwern 21 December 2012 04:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (62)
Tags: psychology statistics frequentism

Comments (62)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 December 2012 02:32:19AM 0 points [-]

If non-NHST frequentism

That'd be essentially Bayesianism with the (uninformative improper) priors (uniform for location parameters and logarithms of scale parameters) swept under the rug, right?

Comment author: jsteinhardt 25 December 2012 02:04:12AM 1 point [-]

Not at all (I wrote a post refuting this a couple months ago but can't link it from my phone)

Comment author: gwern 25 December 2012 10:16:52PM 4 points [-]

http://lesswrong.com/lw/f7t/beyond_bayesians_and_frequentists/ I presume.

Comment author: jsteinhardt 26 December 2012 06:10:43AM 2 points [-]

Thanks!

Comment author: gwern 22 December 2012 03:51:43AM 1 point [-]

I really couldn't presume to say.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit