Someone in the grip of the Dunning-Kruger effect who posts a lot of useless insight-free twaddle will get relatively little karma.
How do you know? (Genuine question.)
I don't know; it's a guess, but it seems a fairly reasonable one. It looks to me as if useless insight-free twaddle tends to get little (or, often, substantially negative) karma.
I'm not claiming this as some sort of exceptionless universal truth, though. Probably carefully tuned insight-free twaddle could get quite a lot of karma.
What's your opinion on this?
Precommitted to publishing this in Discussion to fight publication bias. It looks like intelligence (as measured by IQ, SAT scores, etc.) isn't meaningfully related to how much one posts to LW. Probably in the ideal case, they would be related and higher-IQ people would post more, but that doesn't appear to be going on either.
How well-educated you are doesn't seem to be much related to participation either. I'm not controlling for hours spent on LW for any of this, though.
Script output:
Script source here.