You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

pedanterrific comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 18, chapter 87 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Alsadius 22 December 2012 07:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (592)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 07:44:13PM 10 points [-]

First: Harry and Quirrell can't interact magically. Quirrell didn't Obliviate or Legilimize Harry, and he is not Mr Bester in disguise. (Theoretically he could have Imperiused Sprout to do it, though.)

Second: why would Harry mention that idea here? What purpose would that serve other than to make Hermione feel even more useless and stupid?

Comment author: gwern 22 December 2012 08:07:08PM 1 point [-]

What purpose would that serve other than to make Hermione feel even more useless and stupid?

Not damaging her emotionally even more severely if circumstances force him to use the arbitrage?

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 08:11:37PM *  0 points [-]

Do you think Hermione expects Harry to have not thought about the problem, or to have no ideas about how to solve it?

Edit:

"Fair warning, though," Harry went on, "I might solve the debt to Lucius Malfoy myself if I see a way before you do, it's more important to get that sorted immediately than which one of us gets it sorted. Anything interesting so far?"

Comment author: JTHM 22 December 2012 08:25:46PM 2 points [-]

Hermione ought to think that if Harry knew how to pay off the debt, he would already be working on it. We have every reason to think that as well. But he isn't. And that's what's very, very odd.

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 08:28:54PM 1 point [-]

He has bigger and more urgent problems, is the short version. So?

Comment author: JTHM 22 December 2012 08:32:07PM 0 points [-]

In your own quote, you said:

'it's more important to get that sorted immediately than which one of us gets it sorted."

Regardless of whether it is urgent, Harry obviously believes it to be so.

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 08:34:11PM *  6 points [-]

That says nothing about priorities. It's more important to find the person who framed Hermione than it is to solve the debt, and it's more important to solve the debt than it is which of them solves it. There's no contradiction.

Comment author: JTHM 22 December 2012 08:37:06PM 0 points [-]

There's no reason he can't work on both problems simultaneously.

Comment author: Desrtopa 23 December 2012 03:52:25AM 4 points [-]

Well, he can't work on them to-the-moment simultaneously, so investing time in solving the debt means less time invested in solving the frame up. The debt is on hold for years, whereas the trail for the frame up may be getting colder by the day.

Comment author: JTHM 22 December 2012 07:57:46PM *  0 points [-]

Ah, yes, that would prevent Quirrell from being the occlumency teacher. But Mr. Bester could have been allied with or imperiused by Quirrell, and so Quirrell could use Bester or another person to do the memory modifications for him.

And Harry should have mentioned that gold-and-silver scheme here because if Hermione fails to make a philosopher's stone--which for all Harry knows, she very well may--then if Harry does indeed remember his original gold-and-silver scheme, he will use it anyway. And then Hermione would know that Harry deceived her into thinking that he was actually relying on her, and their relationship would be tarnished.

Moreover, we often hear Harry's thoughts. And he wasn't thinking about his gold-and-silver scheme during his conversation with Hermione.

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 08:06:49PM 4 points [-]

This scene was narrated from Hermione's point of view.

Comment author: JTHM 22 December 2012 08:12:54PM *  0 points [-]

Oh, yeah. slaps forehead. Still, my other points stand.

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 08:19:37PM 0 points [-]

"Fair warning, though," Harry went on, "I might solve the debt to Lucius Malfoy myself if I see a way before you do, it's more important to get that sorted immediately than which one of us gets it sorted. Anything interesting so far?"

Comment author: JTHM 22 December 2012 08:21:57PM 0 points [-]

That could just as easily imply that Harry hasn't thought of a way to pay off the debt as it could imply that he has.

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 08:26:30PM 0 points [-]

He's explicitly saying he's not relying on her to do it. How could that be any clearer?

Comment author: JTHM 22 December 2012 08:28:28PM 0 points [-]

But if he does remember the gold-and-silver scheme, then he's telling Hermione to go work on a problem that isn't necessary to solve--and there's every likelihood that she'd find out.

Comment author: pedanterrific 22 December 2012 08:31:00PM 4 points [-]

"I s'pose you're going to tell me that I don't need to worry about anything and you'll take care of it all?" It came out sounding harsher than she would've wanted, and she felt another stab of guilt for being such a terrible person.

"Nah," Harry said, sounding oddly cheerful. "I can put myself in your shoes well enough to know that if you paid a bunch of money to save me, I'd be trying to pay it back. I'd know it was silly on some level, and I'd still be trying to pay it back all by myself. There's no way I wouldn't understand that, Hermione."

Hermione's face screwed up and she felt moisture in the corners of her eyes.

"Fair warning, though," Harry went on, "I might solve the debt to Lucius Malfoy myself if I see a way before you do, it's more important to get that sorted immediately than which one of us gets it sorted. Anything interesting so far?"

Comment author: MugaSofer 23 December 2012 04:52:59PM -1 points [-]

(Theoretically he could have Imperiused Sprout to do it, though.)

Do we know if Imperiusing someone into casting a spell counts as him casting the spell for Doom purposes?

Comment author: pedanterrific 23 December 2012 06:30:20PM *  0 points [-]

Well no, we don't, not specifically. I'd find it a little odd if it did, but I suppose blackmail or threats or FMCs would also work.

Comment author: MugaSofer 23 December 2012 09:59:06PM 0 points [-]

Well, in canon it's described as similar to having them as an extension of your body, albeit one with it's own skills and knowledge. So it might count less as "coercing someone into casting" than "casting with someone else's wand".

But yeah, it's hardly impossible to force people into helping you.