You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

tgb comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 18, chapter 87 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Alsadius 22 December 2012 07:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (592)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: tgb 23 December 2012 03:45:10AM 2 points [-]

I've wondered before whether Eliezer would use science from after 1992 that Harry couldn't have read. Now I need wonder no longer.

Comment author: Alsadius 23 December 2012 05:26:17AM 7 points [-]

Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "timeless physics".

(Yes, I'm aware that this joke would have been funnier if it was a physics paper)

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 23 December 2012 07:03:26AM 5 points [-]

Actually timeless physics is being treated as Timeless Science in HPMOR - nobody in 1991 should've heard of Julian Barbour yet.

Comment author: Karl 23 December 2012 09:44:09PM 3 points [-]
Comment author: Alsadius 23 December 2012 07:19:20AM 1 point [-]

Ah! I knew there was a funny joke in there somewhere.

Comment author: DanArmak 23 December 2012 04:47:08PM 2 points [-]

While the actual physics has Time-Turners.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 23 December 2012 09:58:39AM 2 points [-]

Twist, Harry's Dark side is actually an embedded copy of a modern day wikipedia?

Comment author: wedrifid 23 December 2012 01:26:28PM 6 points [-]

Twist, Harry's Dark side is actually an embedded copy of a modern day wikipedia?

Test: Watch Harry closely to see if he starts randomly deleting parts of himself!

Comment author: DanArmak 23 December 2012 04:53:13PM 5 points [-]

Inner Slytherin: Quirrel can't be David Monroe, because I asked him about the class of 1943 and he didn't know the teachers' names!

Inner Ravenclaw: [No original research]

Inner Hufflepuff: [Request for Speedy Deletion]

Comment author: Alsadius 23 December 2012 06:30:38PM 7 points [-]

Oh please, like a Ravenclaw would be offended by original research.