You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fubarobfusco comments on UFAI cannot be the Great Filter - Less Wrong Discussion

35 Post author: Thrasymachus 22 December 2012 11:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (90)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 23 December 2012 07:27:06PM -1 points [-]

wireheading that does not involve creating as many sentient organisms as possible

Sure. For instance, consider the directive "Make everyone on Earth live as happily as possible for as long as the sun lasts." Solution: Wirehead everyone, then figure out how to blow up the sun, then shut down — mission accomplished.

Comment author: CarlShulman 24 December 2012 02:55:00AM 9 points [-]

Not if the system is optimizing for the probability of success and can cheaply send out probes to eat the universe and use it to make sure the job is finished lest something go wrong (e.g. the sun-destroyer [???] failed, or aliens resuscitate the Sun under whatever criterion of stellar life is used).

Comment author: fubarobfusco 24 December 2012 09:04:58AM 8 points [-]

"Our analysis of the alien probe shows that its intended function is to ... um ... go back to a star that blew up ten thousand years ago and make damn sure that it's blown up and not just fooling."