You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CannibalSmith comments on UFAI cannot be the Great Filter - Less Wrong Discussion

35 Post author: Thrasymachus 22 December 2012 11:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (90)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CannibalSmith 25 December 2012 01:32:39PM 1 point [-]

Here are my five minutes: nanomachines need to carry a charge to be accelerable, right? Well, it works the other way too - they will decelerate on their own in destination's Van Allen belts.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 December 2012 06:58:25PM 2 points [-]

They don't actually decelerate in the Van Allen belts, though. Magnetic fields apply a force to a charged particle perpendicular to it's direction of motion. F*V = Deceleration Power = 0. Also worth noting that a charged nanomachine has a much higher mass/charge ratio than the usual charged particles (He2+, H+, and e-), so it would be much less affected.

I was actually thinking of neutralizing the seed at the muzzle to avoid troublesome charge effects.