You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Manfred comments on In which I ask an inappropriate question... - Less Wrong Discussion

-16 [deleted] 23 December 2012 02:48PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Manfred 23 December 2012 04:49:27PM 0 points [-]

If one wants to be precise, one should measure deadly harm not in deaths (past people were still going to die if lung cancer didn't get them), but in quality-adjusted life years, pretty much the best unit ever.

And no, I'm not sure assassinating CEOs would help, unless it was public enough and effective enough to actually dissuade people from leading the company in any capacity. Bombing factories would be much more efficient.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 23 December 2012 05:05:22PM 2 points [-]

Should the fact that a fair number of people actually enjoy smoking be figured into this?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 23 December 2012 08:35:17PM 2 points [-]

Second thought: some might say that people only enjoy smoking because they're addicted. On the other hand, people enjoy eating when they're hungry because they need food. Would a serious hedonist want to increase the number and intensity of their desires so as to get more pleasure from fulfilling them?

Comment author: Alicorn 23 December 2012 09:07:00PM 2 points [-]

Katja Grace deliberately sought a caffeine addiction for this reason.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 December 2012 10:10:10PM *  1 point [-]

I think I once heard a story/legend/parable/joke/something about someone who had deliberately bought very tight shoes so that every evening they would enjoy the relief of taking them off.