= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Konkvistador comments on New censorship: against hypothetical violence against identifiable people - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (457)
Would pro-suicide and general anti-natalist posts be covered by this?
Suggesting that specific people commit suicide, obviously yes. People in general... maybe no.
I am not going to explain why, but although death of all people technically includes the death of any specific person X.Y., saying "X.Y. should die" sounds worse than saying "all humans should die".
Um, yes. We don't ant to look like a suicide phyg.
Forget about it.
I'm not trolling. I quite like reading Sister Y's stuff and have said so in the past.
Luckily enough, that blog seems much better than your introduction of it. My troll accusation is founded on your highly repetitive deliberate misunderstanding of the OP. It must be deliberate, as you are usually much smarter than that, and also better in style.
Also, Sister Y is not pro-suicide per se, but against anti-suicide positions; at least that's how I read it.