You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanArmak comments on New censorship: against hypothetical violence against identifiable people - Less Wrong Discussion

22 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 23 December 2012 09:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (457)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 26 December 2012 08:08:10PM *  0 points [-]

What does it mean to make suicide illegal, anyway? You can't punish the perpetrator, they're dead. You can punish their relatives by e.g. taking away their inheritance, but someone who plans their suicide in advance can circumvent that by transferring ownership of the important things before killing themselves.

Comment author: MixedNuts 26 December 2012 09:57:04PM 1 point [-]

Punish attempts. Punish in ways that are avoidable (e.g. inheritance) but work for insufficiently planned suicides. If there's a state religion, predict punishment in the afterlife. Punish relatives directly (North Korea does that).

Comment author: Decius 26 December 2012 09:24:57PM 1 point [-]

It means that you prosecute failed suicides as crimes.

Comment author: DanArmak 26 December 2012 11:31:28PM 0 points [-]

Is there good data on whether this is effective as deterrence? I don't expect it could be effective as punishment: I would expect it to increase despair and poverty, and so to increase chances of recurrent attempts.