You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

EricHerboso comments on Licensing discussion for LessWrong Posts - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Rick_from_Castify 24 December 2012 10:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 24 December 2012 12:19:33PM *  28 points [-]

If you want this post to be discussion about the copyright status of posts on LW, then you should change the title. I expect that a lot of people who would be interested in commenting on that issue might skip over this post because the title gives no indication of the actual topic.

You obviously cannot retroactively change the copyright status of already published posts without the express consent of their authors, but I'd support a move to add a text saying "by pressing submit, you agree to license your post under [some CC license]" to the submission form. Or possibly an option to choose under which license you wish to publish your post, though that would more work for the site programmers.

Also, I hereby declare all of my past and future posts on Less Wrong to be licensed under CC-BY. EDIT: No wait, I can't make such a declaration, because part of my posts are written for MIRI, who owns the copyrights according to the work-for-hire clause in my contract. I'll try to mark these posts somehow, but ask me if you want to be sure.

Comment author: EricHerboso 24 December 2012 10:24:53PM 3 points [-]

I'd like to second a change for so that all future posts are explicitly under whatever license is needed. The mission of LW involves outreach, and you can't effectively conduct outreach if every time a book is published or a podcast is made every author has to be individually contacted for explicit permission.

How do others feel about making this change for all future submissions?

Submitting...

Comment author: Rick_from_Castify 26 December 2012 10:23:18AM 1 point [-]

What would the default license be when someone chooses to "opt out of CC-BY"? Would it be CC-BY-SA?

Comment author: BrassLion 26 December 2012 02:05:30AM 1 point [-]

Voted CC-BY-SA, want CC-BY-SA with opt-out ability. I don't imagine it being used often, but if someone really wants it, it should be there.

Comment author: EricHerboso 24 December 2012 10:26:27PM 0 points [-]

I can't edit a poll, but obviously option 2 was meant to read "allow", not "require".

Comment author: CronoDAS 25 December 2012 03:28:11AM 0 points [-]

I think your intent shows through anyway - content is available under CC-BY unless you specifically opt out.