You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

BrassLion comments on Licensing discussion for LessWrong Posts - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Rick_from_Castify 24 December 2012 10:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: BrassLion 26 December 2012 02:13:53AM 4 points [-]

Can we be less rude to people that aren't used to our community's discussion norms? Calling someone a parasite isn't going to convince them of anything, and we want people like Rick to engage with us instead of just exchange some money and ignore the community.

Comment author: David_Gerard 26 December 2012 10:34:40AM *  0 points [-]

The problem is that the arrangement posited is in fact odious, and that that aspect is important. If you have a word of equal accuracy that concisely communicates the problematic nature of the posited arrangement, I'm all ears.

Comment author: BrassLion 26 December 2012 04:59:09PM 1 point [-]

In this case, the point would be just as strong with no word there instead. "Odious" is also a good word, come to think of it - not "you are odious" but "the arrangement is odious, because you seek to make money by other people's uncompensated labor," assume that's in fact the business model.