You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on What if "status" IS a terminal value for most people? - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: handoflixue 24 December 2012 08:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (111)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 24 December 2012 09:33:45PM *  13 points [-]

Which statement in this context would one consider as evidence for not valuing status?

Comment author: wedrifid 24 December 2012 10:42:28PM 13 points [-]

Which statement in this context would one consider as evidence for not valuing status?

This statement is evidence for not valuing status. Curiously, given the way evidence works, this is entirely compatible with Konkvistador's claim and also with the interpretation he suggests many will have.

As an example consider p(has this trait) raising from 0.001 to 0.01. It would still be most likely that this was a status move but there has been an update in favor of "has this trait".

Comment author: shokwave 25 December 2012 10:06:46AM 1 point [-]

Upvote for "I did the math and your claim was correct".

Comment author: [deleted] 24 December 2012 09:47:28PM *  7 points [-]

Terminal vs. Instrumental valuing something is a tricky distinction to make in humans! I have to shrug and say I don't know.

Not seeming to care about status on the other hand is quite easy to detect. The argument wouldn't have shown much optimization for making the author look high status. For example an opportunity to talk about positive traits the author has may be passed up.

Also note I wasn't claiming the paragraph was evidence, just that it would be seen as a status grab. It is after all status raising if taken as an accurate description of a person in our community.

Comment author: handoflixue 25 December 2012 12:23:04AM 7 points [-]

I had genuinely not considered that it would ACTUALLY raise my status to make that claim. This was originally written for a more mainstream audience, where that claim would (I presume) be low status. A friend of mine even commented in a bit of shock that this wasn't an obvious fact of the world to me.

I find it amusing that my accidental status grab has been subverted by you, and turned in to a potential loss of status :)

Comment author: FiftyTwo 25 December 2012 01:19:34AM 3 points [-]

A confession of socially inappropriate/immoral behaviour.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 28 December 2012 09:08:18AM 0 points [-]

Sharing something highly personal and embarassing?

Comment author: shminux 28 December 2012 06:04:29PM 0 points [-]

Might also be considered an attempt to signal status with "Look how brave I am!". After all, that's what many think Eliezer's OkCupid profile is.