You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

srn347 comments on META: Deletion policy - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 December 2012 01:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (91)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 December 2012 07:10:06PM 1 point [-]

Indeed, and we (the LW community) have to learn to tell the difference between deliberate trolls and misguided rationalists for our moderation to be effective. In the same way that replying to a troll is a mistake in that it feeds their attention craving, not replying to a wrong non-troll can be a mistake in that they don't notice their error. Maybe a lower downvote limit (4xkarma) would help break aforementioned habit.

Comment author: Epiphany 27 December 2012 02:43:39AM 3 points [-]

Then there's the possibility that someone enjoys intentionally pretending to be clueless as a means of trolling and further enjoys that it disrupts people's instinct to provide guidance to misguided rationalists.

Comment author: [deleted] 27 December 2012 06:07:24AM 0 points [-]

That would be incredibly difficult on the moderators. Thankfully, being smart enough to think of that and dumb enough to be a troll isn't a very plausible interval for human intellect.

Comment author: Epiphany 27 December 2012 08:07:19AM 5 points [-]

Unfortunately, sometimes gifted people are trolls.